Clinical evaluations have several important differences from Post Market Surveillance:

  1. In many jurisdictions they are a prerequisite for market access submissions
  2. They are compiled and evaluated by third parties
  3. Emphasis is on clinical performance and safety
  4. They are much more in-depth than a Post Market Surveillance report
  5. The reports are mandatory under the Essential Requirements (6a)
  6. A clinical study may be required to demonstrate compliance

Regulatory agencies and notified bodies would expect Clinical Evaluations for devices in risk classifications 1 to 2a to typically be about 40 pages in length. For devices in risk classifications 2b and 3 the clinical evaluation should be very comprehensive and 300 page dossiers would not be unusual.

 

 



* indicates required fields

Name*:

Email*:

Device:

Please
contact me
regarding:

Post Market Surveillance
Clinical Evaluation
Post Market Clinical Follow Up

Comments:

For form security, please check the box that most closely matches the characters in the graphic:


ABC593 YxI894 A7fC9

Please put me on your mailing list so that I can receive the latest information on regulatory and/or quality issues.

 

© Copyright 2016 Horizon Phoenix Group.